1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 3
Allegation: Staff not responding to responsible person's request for communication regarding resident's (R1) care and services.
RP stated that staff S2 opened R1's mail and that FM wants to know what's going on and requested to have a meeting/discussion with former Executive Director (ED). The ED told FM she will look on it. FM had a phone conversation on January 6, 2024 regarding the issues and concerns FM brought up but never got a response/answer from former ED.
LPA interviewed former ED who stated she talked to FM a lot over the phone, one was on 11/28/23 for 39 minutes, on 12/20/23 for 15 minutes, and for 16 & 20 minutes on 1/03/24. S1 also provided FM updates via phone calls and text messages. Copies of text messages, proof of phone calls obtained by LPA confirmed former ED's statements. LPA interviewed S1 who stated she communicated and provided updates to FM. S2 stated she communicated with FM via email, text & phone calls and has got into a point where FM communicated and called the staff daily. S1 also stated that they set up a weekly schedule which FM agreed, and assigned S1 and she (S2) will step up if S1 is not available to speak with FM. S2 stated that iff S1 is not available, FM will S2, the former ED and that FM also calls outside the weekly schedule.
Based on information obtained, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Staff interfere with residents' mail.
It was alleged that R1's mail was opened by staff.
S2 stated when she went to R1's apartment on 12/2023 to check on R1, she observed a correspondence pertaining to insurance which need to be renewed by 01/2024, so she sent the picture of the correspondence to FM which LPA obtained a copy of the text message and correspondense. S1 denied opening R1 or any of residents' mail and stated she does not have key to R1's mailbox. LPA interviewed other staff (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6 and S7) who all denied opening residents' mail. AED stated not observing staff opening residents mail nor was brought to her attention. LPA also interview residents (R2 and R3) who stated their mail were never opened by staff. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated.
......continued on 9099C (page 4) |