1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ...continued from LIC9099.
Allegations: UNSUBSTANTIATED
Staff working while under the influence of alcohol.
The reporting party remained anonymous; however, S1 and S2 thinks they know who initiated the complaint. LPA reviewed personnel records for disciplinary actions against staff from February 2025 - May 2025, no records revealed any misuse of alcohol while staff were on duty. On 02/25/25, S2 stated that S3 was being mean towards S1; it wasn't right. S3 was looking for S1 with a disgusting look (teasing). S1 stated that the complaint has no merit and S1 is not comfortable being with S3. S3 stated that he/she did not want to mention who told him/her that S1 smells like alcohol because S3 doesn’t want to get them in trouble. S1 stated that S3 said he/she smelled tequila. S2, S3, S6, R1, R2, and R3’s interviews did not reveal any witnessing or knowledge of any staff working while under the influence of alcohol.
Staff disrespectful to residents and residents' families.
R1 stated that everything is okay at the facility. R1 said he/she had not met or talked to S1 yet, but R1 has seen S1. R2 thinks he/she is getting what R2 needs, but has not met S1, and has lived at the facility for over 2 years. R3 said he/she has only talked or interacted with S7, and “S7 is realistic about what’s going on.” R3 has not met S2 or S1.
Based on information obtained, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that the allegations are not valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met.
Exit interview conducted, and a copy of this report provided to Justin Zackzewski, Director of Hospitality.
|