1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099-C
Allegation: Staff didn't ensure leak was fixed properly
Investigation Findings: It was reported to the department that R1’s unit had flooded due to the negligence of the upstairs neighbor. W1 informed LPA that W1 thought R1’s apartment was flooded due to an upstairs neighbor flooding his/her’s room. S1 informed LPA that S3 had inspected both rooms and reported that the water damage was due to a faucet being left on in R2’s room. not due to a broken water pipe. LPA inspected both rooms and saw that there is water damage to both rooms, but no water flowing. LPA could not see an ongoing leak. R2 would not speak to LPA to confirm where or not R2 left a faucet on. S1 informed LPA that S3 determined the water damage in R1’s room came from a faucet in R2’’s room. Based on interviews and inspection, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Based on interviews, inspection and record reviews conducted, the above allegations are unsubstantiated.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.
No deficiencies observed or cited during this visit.
Exit interview conducted and a copy this report was provided.
|