1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | W1 stated that another Ombudsman came to the facility on 12/19/25 and ED was out. W1 stated there was no designated staff in ED's absence.
S1 confirmed that he was the MOD on the said date and that Ombudsman (W2) came over and asked for R1's financial documents, however, only S4, ED and corporate have access to residents' financial records. S1 further stated he sent email that same day to W2 regarding the conversation that transpired between him and W2 and included ED and S4 on the email, however, the email didn't go through. Copy of the email confirmed S1's statement. S1 also stated that any information pertaining to residents' care, there's always staff present to provide information.
LPA interviewed ED who confirmed he was not at the facility on the said date, however, the manager on duty (MOD) that day was S1 and MOD's support was S3. ED further stated that on his days off, there's always MOD assigned. ED stated that only him, S4 and corporate have access to the residents' financial records.
S3 confirmed she was at the facility on 12/19/25. S3 and S2 both stated there's always MOD scheduled when ED is out.
Based on information gathered and review of LIC500, the allegation in unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
No deficiency cited.
Exit interview conducted and copy of this report provided. |