1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Interviews with staff (S1-S9) on 4/19/22 were inconsistent on date/times of incidents. S4 claims to have heard C1 cry, and then S9 say the child’s hair was pulled to teach the child a lesson. While S9 acknowledged being frustrated with C1, the staff claims to have been misunderstood and denied pulling C1’s hair. No staff interviews supported S9 putting C1 hard down on a changing table.
Interviews support staff are meeting reporting requirements, though S9 acknowledged not reporting one incident to a parent, the LPA could not determine if it happened and if it was reportable due to conflicting statement by S4 who was also present. Interviews with witnesses (W1-W6) on 4/20 & 4/21 indicated that no hair pulling had ever been witnessed on the room camera’s nor had witnesses seen anyone rough handled on the changing table. The witnesses stated they have good communications with staff and are alerted to any concerns.
The LPA has determined that though S9 acknowledges being frustrated, the two staff present provided opposing statements and conflicting dates/times were given making video confirmation unreliable on what really happened and if it was a reportable incident.
Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated.
|