1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Mendez interviewed five staff (S1-S5) on 8/2/22, 8/5/22, 8/8/22 and 8/11/22. LPA Mendez asked staff if they are withholding food from children’s lunchboxes and 5 out of 5 stated no. However, staff interviews were also consistent instating food has been sent back home if considered “too sweet”.
LPA Mendez interviewed parents (P1-P8) on 8/1/22,8/8/22, and 9/19/22. LPA Mendez asked parents if there were aware of the facility’s no sweets policy, 8 out of 8 parents stated yes. LPA Mendez asked parents if their child’s food was returned 4 out 8 have had their child’s food returned.
Although staff and parent interviews were consistent in stating food had been retuned and sent home for being “too sweet” it could not be determined if children were held without food, not offered an alternative option or if a violation occurred.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred, and the findings are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted. The Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 days. |