1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099.
During the initial interview W1 stated R1’s rent was being raised, and the facility did not provide anything writing or give a 60-days’ notice. S1 stated during the interview that R2, R4, and R5’s was being increased not R1. S1 stated a notice was given to the three (3) residents. LPA reviewed the rate increase notices and observed the notices indicated it was given February 21, 2025, and would be effective on April 1, 2025, therefore, the required 60-days’ notice was not given.
Allegation: Staff does not ensure the food served is of good quality
During the initial interview W1 stated the facility only serves ethnic foods and if the residents don’t like the food they are served peanut butter and jelly. S1 stated the residents have a variety of foods for breakfast, lunch, and dinner is pretty much set. If a resident does not like what is made, they are given options such as buying their own food, a sandwich, or sometimes staff will purchase something. R1 stated the food is ok and is given a sandwich if he doesn’t like what is cooked. R2 stated the food is ok but feels more snacks are needed. LPA toured kitchen and observed there was a lot of pork, ¼ gallon of milk, 1 gallon of orange juice, not enough perishables or snacks.
Based on interviews which were conducted, record review, and observation the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and this report provided.
|