1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Continued from LIC9099.
$250.00 each at Wal-Mart, yet when R1 expired the money was not found. W1 also stated there was conversation regarding money for incontinence products between R1 and S1. S1 stated during interview there was a conversation to pay more for incontinence products and R1’s cat, but S1 stated she never received any additional money. S1 stated R1 and S2 had went to the bank and obtained cash. S1 also had knowledge that R1 had bought candy and clothes. S2 stated during interview that he went with R1 to Wal-Mart two days. S2 recalled R1 had obtained money during the outing and bought candy. S2 stated that R1 had given him $100.00, and he gave $20.00 back to R1. Based on interviews R1 handled her own money, furthermore there is not enough evidence to prove any financial abuse.
Allegation: Family is not notified of incidents involving resident.
W1 stated during initial interview that a witness was told by the Pittsburg Police Department that R1 had recently been discharged from a hospital in Modesto. W1 stated the facility did not notify the family about any hospitalization. W1 was not able to give an exact date, but it was approximately two weeks prior to R1 expiring. W3 stated there was an after-summary visit document dated May 7, 2024, along with medications sitting on the dresser of R1’s room. During record review of the after-summary visit from Pittsburg Health Center Family Medicine it indicated the visit was a follow-up visit from a hospital. The summary did not specify when R1 visited the hospital or which hospital was visited. S1 stated she was not aware of R1 going to a hospital in Modesto. S1 did not have any documentation for R1.
Continued on LIC9099C.
|