1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Facility staff ignored request for help from resident
Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation, LPA interviewed staff (ED, S1) who denied that staff ignore any resident’s’ request for help. Staff are trained to assist each resident with their activities of daily living such as toileting, grooming, dressing, incontinence care, meals and medication management. During unannounced visits on 02/23/24, 02/27/24 and 08/09/24 LPA observed staff assisting residents with medications, meals, snacks, recreational activities, pharmacy refills, doctors’ appointments. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff ignored request for help from resident is unsubstantiated.
Allegation: Facility staff did not meet incontinence needs of residents
Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated
During investigation, staff (ED, S1) confirmed with LPA that they followed residents’ weekly shower schedules in the AM/PM shifts and assisted residents with their daily hygiene needs such as changing diapers, toileting, grooming and dressing activities. LPA also reviewed random residents’ care plans which showed staff provided daily assistance with bathing (2X or more per week), daily toileting (AM, PM), dressing (AM, bedtime), changing diapers (2X to 3X per shift or as needed), dental care & grooming (AM, PM). Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that facility staff did not meet incontinence needs of residents is unsubstantiated.
Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C3 |