1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The allegation of “Facility Staff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings.” alleges that resident #1 (R1)’s two (2) pairs of Levi jeans, five (5) long sleeved shirts, two (2) robes, and a pair of black Velcro sneakers that they arrived to the facility with are now missing. Additionally, the allegation alleges that a suede jacket was washed improperly and ruined by facility staff. LPA reviewed R1’s file and reviewed their signed personal property and valuables sheet. LPA observed this sheet to be signed by both Resident #1 (R1) and the facility Administrator. LPA observed this sheet to indicate that R1 arrived to the facility with two (2) pants, nine (9) t-shirts, three (3) outerwear, two (2) underwear, and six (6) socks. LPA did not observe the property and valuables sheet to contain robes, long sleeved shirts, or sneakers. LPA observed R1’s closet and observed eight (8) t-shirts. Additionally, LPA observed R1 wearing one (1) t-shirt. LPA did not observe any additional clothing items in R1’s closet. LPA interviewed the Administrator, the Designee, and S1. All three (3) staff interviewed did not know where the outerwear, underwear, or socks were located. The Administrator confirmed that the two pairs of jeans were rendered unwearable following accidents and were subsequently discarded. The Administrator and Designee stated that they are in the process of replacing the pants and they should be arriving Sunday (07/27/2025). LPA interviewed Witness #1 (W1) who stated that they were in control of R1’s suede jacket. W1 confirmed that the jacket never resided at the facility and was not ruined in the laundry. During today's visit LPA was provided with copies of receipts showing the order of two (2) pairs of Levi Jeans and men's boxers tare o be delivered Sunday (07/27/2025). Based on the information obtained during interviews there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “Facility Staff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings.” Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time.
The following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099D). This report was read to the Administrator via telephone call. A copy of the report was printed, appeal rights were provided, and exit interview was conducted. |