1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Pertaining to the allegation: Staff did not meet daycare child's toileting needs:
RP alleged C1 was sent home wearing soiled underwear. RP alleged C1 was picked up and they observed soiled underwear an hour later. Per RP, C1 stated they used the bathroom at school and was not helped to wipe themselves.
During staff interviews, all Staff 1-3 stated they remind the children in their class to use the bathroom throughout the day. The obtained sample potty log reflects scheduled times to offer the bathroom: 9:30, 10:30, 11:45, 2:30, 3:30, 4:30, and 5:30. The longest time a child is not reminded to use the bathroom is 11:45-2:30, which is the typical napping period at the facility. All staff stated that if children need to use the restroom more often, they can. Child interviews revealed that children know to tell staff if they need to use the bathroom and ask for help if they need it. LPA observed children using the bathroom outside of the scheduled times. Parent 1 (P1) stated during interview that S2 informed them “I don’t wipe butts and anyways I’m not supposed to”. Staff in the younger classroom assist with wiping as children learn to use the toilet by themselves. Staff in the older classrooms do not assist unless asked by the child. Staff 2 and Staff 4 stated C1 is toilet trained.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Appeal rights provided.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with Licensee Svetlana (Lana) Costache via telephone and in-person with Facility Representative Jeanne Burley.
|