1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | -Pertaining to the allegation that “Staff provided a daycare child with not an age-appropriate material while in care”:
This allegation pertains to whether or not a long handled wooden spoon would be considered to be “age-appropriate” for a child under the age of 2 or not.
Per the facility’s policy for their Loose Parts Program, “The following items are prohibited in classrooms that serve children younger than three (3) years of age: items that fit in the choke tub; small, ingestible art supplies (e.g. glitter and small cotton balls, feathers & pom poms); Styrofoam products or pieces (e.g. packing peanuts). Artwork displays using staples, thumbtacks, push pins, small magnets, or frames with glass. Instead, tape, magnetic tape, Velcro, sticky tack, plastic box frames, and DocU Pockets (available on BrightBuy) should be used in younger classrooms and common area displays. Item which are prohibited for this age group, per product directions or guidelines…The following Toxic/Dangerous items may be present in a classroom but must be out of the reach of and inaccessible to children (see Storage section below):…sharp objects.”
Though the handle of the wooden spoon appears to be long and wooden, it does not appear to be sharp, nor does anywhere else on the spoon appear to be sharp. In other words, the wooden spoon would appear to be “age-appropriate” for an infant who is, by definition, younger than three years of age.
However, three of the nine persons interviewed stated that they do not believe that the wooden spoon was “age-appropriate.”
When asked how to gauge whether or not a toy would be deemed to be “age-appropriate” for an child under the age of 2, one of the nine staff interviewed stated that “they use a measuring cup to gauge which toys are appropriate, and the measuring cup is used to prevent a choking hazard…the objects at the facility must not be able to fit inside the measuring cup in order to be considered age appropriate.” Per this staff, “the wooden spoon was too large to fit inside the measuring cup” and was thus deemed age-appropriate for infants to play with. However, when asked by IB Investigator Seng if it were possible for an object to be too large to fit inside the measuring cup and still not be considered to be age-appropriate, the staff concurred.
After this incident, five of the nine staff state that “such items” or “such utensils” “kitchen utensils” or the wooden spoon in particular are no longer allowed in the curriculum, as their policy was adjusted and the Center “decided that spoons were not a safe option to have in the environment.” Page 3
|