1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | From 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., LPA interviewed five (5) staff, Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2). LPA attempted to interview, Resident #3 (R3) and Resident #4(R4) but they did not clearly respond to LPA's questions.
Allegation: Staff not keeping resident’s room free from odor. It was alleged S1 is not keeping residents room free from odor. To investigate the allegation, on 04/07/2025 at 9:12 a.m., LPA conducted a physical plant tour. During the initial visit LPA interviewed the administrator, the house manager, six (6) staff and (2) out of four (4) residents. During the physical plant tour, LPA did not smell any unpleasant odor in residents' bedrooms. LPA did not observe any items on the floor. Interview with five (5) staff corroborated they did not have concerns regarding S1 or with the facility's cleanliness. Staff corroborate it is part of their job duties to clean residents bedrooms. During interviews with residents they did not express concerns regarding the facility's odor.
Based on observations and interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
Allegation: Staff not changing residents diaper needs resulting in a rash. Regarding the allegation is was reported residents have sustained diaper rashes due to S1 not changing their diaper for an extended amount of time. A co-complainant reported it was R1 that had developed a rash. LPA's interview with the house manger denied the allegation. LPA's interview with six (6) staff deny the allegation stating R1 is able to go to the toilet with assistance and is provided timely assistance with diaper changing. Staff corroborate they do not leave residents soiled for an extended time and have not started a shift when a resident in a soiled diaper. According to staff, R1 is able to communicate when they have to use the bathroom or have had an accident. During interviews with residents they did not express concerns regarding assistance and R2 denied witnessing staff purposely delay responding to residents. LPA's review of R1 Physician's Report revealed R1 is not bowl or bladder impaired.
Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.
(Page 2 of 3) |