1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 06/06/2022 at 10:10am, R1 states, “R2 has never stolen food from me. It’s not so much food, it’s just stuff. If I put something away, they will be after it. I keep my snacks in this cabinet, yes, but they can’t get to it. I stop them from taking my stuff.” On 06/06/2022 at 10:15am, R2 denies the allegation. R3-5 were unable to interview due to their cognitive ability. On 06/06/2022 at 10:31am R6 states, “There are no residents that steal food.”
During interviews with staff, 3 out of 3 confirmed the allegation to be false. On 06/06/2022 at 10:46am S1 states, “R2 never takes anyone’s food. Not even their roommate.” On 06/06/2022 at 10:52am S2 states, “I’ve never seen R2 take anyone’s food. R1 doesn’t say anything about that either.” On 06/06/2022 at 10:59am S3 states, “no, never seen or heard R2 taking food from R1 or anyone.”
During interviews with witnesses, 2 out of 2 confirmed the allegation to be false. On 06/06/2022 at 12:37am W1 states, “no, I’m not aware of anyone having their food stolen. When I do my visits, they are usually unannounced.” On 06/06/2022 at 12:41am W2 states, “no, I’ve never known R2 to steal anything. Especially food, they are more of a slow eater so if they were stealing, staff would catch them. In fact, R2 had a physical and lost weight so if they were stealing food that would be more of a weight gain than lost.”
On 06/06/2022, LPA observed R2 in the living room during inspection. LPA did not observe any chairs or items that could be used to block or confine a resident to their bed. LPA observed the wheelchair of R2 in the living room beside resident. LPA did not observe any electrical extension cords connected to another. LPA reviewed the physician report and needs and services plan for R2 which indicates resident’s non-ambulatory status and the support of the facility to get in and out of bed with staff assistance.
Based on LPA’s observation, interviews conducted, and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was given.
|