1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (R1’s) meals consisted of fruits, vegetables, grains, proteins, dairy, and juices according to the facility menu (dated: October 2023 – November 2023). (A1) reported that all residents are entitled to in-between snacks with fruits, pudding, crackers, and liquid refreshments.
On 01/30/24, between 11:30 am – 12:10 pm, the Department interviewed (3) out (3) staff #1-#3 all verified that (R1) was provided with low sodium meals daily. (S1-S3) reported that meals are well-balanced meals with proteins, carbs, fiber, vitamins, and liquids.
On 01/30/24, between 9:45 am – 10:50 am, the Department interviewed (3) out (4) residents #2-#4 (R2-R4) who were satisfied with the meals and were not on any special diet. (R4) claimed the meals are good portions and there’s a variety. (R4) often would have to request salt (R4) preferred the food on the saltier flavor.
On 01/30/24, between 10:56 am - 12:19 pm, the Department interviewed (3) out of (4) family representatives witness #2 -#4 (W2-W4) reported no concern or issues with the meals provided to the residents in care.
On 01/30/24 between 11:20 am 11:30 am, the Department reached out to (R1) by telephone who was not available for an interview due to (R1’s) health condition. Witness #1 (W1) a conservator to (R1) did not want to be interviewed and did not want to release any information regarding these allegations.
The Department reviewed (R1’s) Medication Administration Record (MAR) (date: October 2023 – November 2023). (R1) was prescribed Atenolol (1) tablet daily, Creon (3) capsule daily, and Miralax (1) capful daily. All these medications have side effects for swelling of legs, ankles, and joints, and dehydration (ref: MayoClinic.org). It was verified that all staff had been trained in the safe preparation of food.
A separate investigation was conducted by Carson Sheriff Station on 11/14/23 and 11/5/23 and the investigation revealed no evidence of neglect/elder abuse.
Based on the information provider, an inspection of the facility, observation, interviews, and analysis of records, the Department found no evidence to support the allegations mentioned above.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, as a result, the allegations are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Yolanda Bernardo, and a copy of the report was provided. |