1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (A1) communicated that (R1) was an AWL and SSI recipient and that (R1) was evicted for non-payment and failed to adhere to the facility’s house rules and policies. (A1) confirmed to have received a payment from (ALW) in March 2024, which was deposited into the facility's account. (A1) reported that (R1) had health issues that required hospitalization in January 2024, and was hospitalized after being issued a 30-day Eviction Notice. (A1) claimed that (R1) never signed an Admissions Agreement. As a result, (R1) is not considered a resident at the facility. (A1) assumed that without an Admission Agreement, there is no valid contract with (R1). (A1) did not have an obligation to accept the resident back and the 30-day Notice was served. (A1) claimed (R1)’s belongings were picked up while the resident was still in the hospital. In (A1)'s opinion, (R1) needed a higher level of care but did not have a medical assessment from the hospital records to support the claim. (A1) agreed to provide a copy of the Eviction Notice issued to (R1) and a copy of the facsimile receipt sent to the (WHS) (CCL) Regional office to LPA Dabuet on 05/19/24.
On 05/18/24, between 03:35 pm – 4:4pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ernand Dabuet interviewed staff #1 (S1) and residents #2-#3 (R2-R3). (R2-R3) claimed they did not know about (R1)’s residency before their placement at this facility. (S1) claimed to have no knowledge of the matter concerning (R1) as (S1) is a recent hire at the facility. ( R4) was unavailable for an interview and could not give a statement.
(LPA) Ernand Dabuet could not obtain additional statements related to the allegations in this complaint from (R1) due to unreturned calls.
According to internal records (dated: 01/17/24, 01/18/24, and 01/23) reviewed by (LPA) Dabuet, (A1) was informed of by (CCL) Associate Government Program Analyst (AGPA) Aileen Aguinaldo, it is the responsibility of the facility despite the 30-day Eviction Notice issue to (R1), and that (A1) agreed and will allow (R1) to return to the facility.
(Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C)
This report serves as an amendment to clarify the finding. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected in the report created on 05/19/24. |