1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This is an amended report and supercedes report dated 8/11/21. Additional details were added, but the findings were not changed.***
The investigation consisted of the following: Regarding the allegation that facility staff does not safeguard residents' belongings, LPA Spencer reviewed the admissions agreement showing the facility's theft and loss policy includes inventory of residents personal property and valuables. LPA reviewed residents' files and observed that all residents had a completed personal property and valuables inventory list. Interviewed staff stated that if residents report missing items, the staff will look for the items, inform the responsible party, and replace the item if not found. Staff stated that any missing items are usually found in the resident's room. Three (3) out of five (5) residents stated that they have not had missing items, while two (2) out of five (5) stated they were missing items such as clothing and important papers. However, the resident reporting missing clothing stated that it was stolen by a staff member whose name was not listed on the staff roster, and the resident who stated they were missing important papers stated in a follow-up interview that it was later found in the resident's room.
Regarding the allegation that staff open residents' mail, all staff interviewed stated that residents' mail is given to the residents' responsible party unless the resident is self responsible, independent and gets their own mail. All staff denied the allegation that staff open the residents' mail. The administrator stated that R6's mail was mistakenly forwarded to the administrator's P.O. Box and was partially opened and crumpled but gave it to the resident and explained what happened. The administrator stated that the mail was never opened by facility staff and it was likely damaged at the post office during the sorting of the mail. Four (4) out of five (5) residents stated that their family gets their mail and were unaware of staff opening residents' mail, while one (1) out of five (5) stated that two letters were pre-opened when the resident received it.
Based upon interviews conducted and records reviewed, the findings indicate although the allegation(s) may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation(s) are Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Elna Villaflor and a hard copy of the report was provided. |