1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Staff 1(S1) stated that marks were observed by the child’s underarm area which looked like a puffy red blotch. According to S1, the marks did not look like hand marks. S1 also stated that It reminded her of another student who has eczema, it looked puffy as well. S1 stated she did not observe any scratches on child’s chest or chin.
Staff 2(S2) recalls changing child’s shirt in the restroom as child’s shirt was wet. While changing the shirt, S2 noticed redness under child’s underarm that looked like eczema. S2 denies seeing any scratches on child’s chest or under the chin. S2 stated that parent was given a wellness report regarding what was observed.
Parent(s) interviewed stated that they have no issues with any staff or the school. They are satisfied with the service.
A review of child’s health history provided at the time of enrollment documented a skin irritation and medication used to treat it. Initial pictures submitted by RP showed some redness as alleged in the complaint and a subsequent picture of the child’s underarm taken three days later showed what appeared to be a small bruise. However, LPA could not confirm that the mark observed in the second picture came from a staff’s finger and/or from child being handled roughly.
Based on the above, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit interview conducted with the Christina Gregory. Copy of report provided and Notice of Site Visit provided and shall be posted for 30 days in an area accessible for review. |