1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | RP alleged, “Staff did not prevent children in care from causing injuries to another child in care.
and “Staff are not providing adequate supervision to day care children” LPA, Tuba obtained from the Assistant Director a statement from S4, as well as interviewed S4 who stated that there was an incident that occurred between C1 and C2, however did not observe any injuries during that time. LPAs interviewed C1 who disclosed that C2 did scratch C1's arm, however LPAs were unable to interview C2 to confirm. LPAs interviewed S1, S2 and S3 who had conflicting stories as to what exactly occurred on 4/8/2025. Based on LPA, Tuba’s observation of the incident that took place between C1 and C2 it was not clear if there may have been blind spots on the playground, however LPA Tuba consulted with the Director and Assistant Director, Rodriquez that staff should always spread themselves out as best practice and since the playground is a big area then certain parts of the playground can be closed or equipment can be moved. According to (AS3) a meeting was conducted with parent of C1 of the incident that had occurred and S4 was present during the meeting who had supervised C1 and C2. S4 stated that she did not observe any injuries to C1, however C1 did have scratches on the inner part of their arm and facility was unsure how that had occurred.
Based on interviews with C1, S1, S2 and S3 the allegations, “Staff did not prevent children in care from causing injuries to another child in care.” and “Staff are not providing adequate supervision to day care children.” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.
A Notice of Site Visit was provided and must be posted for 30 days. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Assistant Director, Alicia Rogriguez.
page 2 of 2 |