1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Licensee does not live in the home - LPA conducted interviews with complainant, Licensee, and relevant parties. Per complainant, the Licensee provided documents with different addresses. Per Licensee, the Licensee has lived at the day care facility since March 2022 (the facility was licensed on 8/17/22). Per relevant parties, the Licensee moved into the home on 8/17/22 and no children were observed on the premises. Additionally, one relevant party disclosed that the signature on a pertinent document of the application packet initially submitted by the Licensee was inauthentic.
During complaint investigation visits, LPA observed clothes, shoes, and personal belongings in the Licensee’s bedroom, bedroom closet, and bathroom.
This agency has investigated the complaint alleging the Licensee does not live in the home. Based upon the evidence as presented above, the allegations have been determined to be Unsubstantiated. A finding of Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore at this time the above allegations are unsubstantiated.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days. Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Jing Fang. |