1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding the allegation: Staff brings infant child into the facility. RP alleged that staff brings infant child and child crawls in classrooms. During the complaint visit at the facility, LPA observed S4 carrying an infant. When S4 was asked who the child was, S4 replied that the child is S4’s child. S4 also indicated that the child is 20 months of age and not feeling well, that is why the child is present at the facility. LPA interviewed children at the facility. When C2 was asked if anyone brings a baby to school, C2 responded “Yes, a teacher's baby”. When C3 was asked the same question, C3 responded “Sometimes the teacher have one. The baby crawls around”. LPA reviewed the facility license and observed that the facility is licensed to serve children from 2 to 5 years of age.
Based on LPA’s interviews and observations which were conducted, the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 & Chapter 1, Article 02, 101161(a) is being cited on the attached LIC9099D.
An exit Interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights along with Notice of Site visit was provided to the Hongjiang Liu, Director. Notice of Site visit must be posted for 30 days.
page 2 of 2 |