1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Based on the paperwork obtained , facility had 8 infants and 4 staff members present on the day of the incident. LPA interviewed director and staff members present on the day of the incident. Per Director, they were not aware of incident until received email from the C1`s parent . Per Director statements, they did not see the video footage from the date of the incident but interviewed 2 staff members and response was emailed to the parent , which was confirmed by the parent and copy was provided to LPA. During the interviews staff members present disclosed that no incidents occurred with C1 during the day care hours. Two staff members disclosed they remembered C1 was more emotional than usual . Per S5 they remember staff member contacted C1`s parent which was confirmed by the parent. LPA was unable to obtain video footage from the facility due to the hard drive limited space. LPA interviewed parents and no disclosures were obtained to support allegations.
Based on the investigation , although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit Interview was conducted, copy of this report along with Notice of Site visit and Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the Facility Representative, Araceli Guzman on 02/23/2026.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Failure to comply with posting requirements shall result in an immediate civil penalty of $100.
Page 2 of 2
|