1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA interviewed parent, who disclosed observing an exterminator company employee in the paly area during the pick-up inspecting the area, but they did not observe them spraying the area.
LPA conducted interviews with staff members, additional parents and contacted the extermination company used by the facility. According to the records and invoices provided by the exterminator company, the facility was serviced on December 9, 2025, and again on December 22, 2025. Spraying occurred on December 22, 2025, between the hours of 5:00 PM and 6:04 PM, as noted in the invoice.
During the interview ,Staff 3 (S3) reported seeing an employee from the extermination company in the facility between 5:45 PM and 6:20 PM. S3 confirmed that the facility was sprayed after the children had left. No disclosures were obtained from the parents regarding this matter.
Based on the investigation, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
An exit Interview was conducted, copy of this report along with Notice of Site visit and Appeal Rights were explained and provided to the Facility Representative, Araceli Guzman on 02/23/2026.
A notice of site visit was given and must remain posted for 30 days.
Page 2 of 2
|