1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | LPA Richard attempted to interview R1, who declined to answer any of the questions asked.
Regarding the allegation, Staff made a false report about a resident in care. Based on interviews, and record reviews, the department found no evidence to support the allegation mentioned above. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. As a result, the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Allegation #6: Staff prevented the resident from having a visitor in care.
This complaint alleges that the staff is not allowing the residents' visitors to visit the residents and stated that the resident is not there. On 12/03/24, between 12:00 pm -2:00 pm, LPA interviewed administrator #1, Maria Bravo (A1), who denied the allegation. A1 stated that all the residents have visitors seven days a week. If the residents share rooms, they cannot have visitors inside the room, unless it’s a private room. On 12/03/24 between 12:00 pm - 2:00 pm, LPA interviewed the facility front desk (S2) and stated that most of the residents have visitors, and they must sign in and out. Sometimes, the family members refuse to sign in and out, but we never deny them entry. On 12/03/24, between 10:30 am -12:00 pm, LPA interviewed seven (7) residents (R1-R7), and 6 out of 7 stated that they do have family members visit them; they all know that if they have a roommate, they cannot have visitors inside their room. On 12/03/24, between 12:00 pm and 2:00 pm, LPA interviewed six (6) staff (S1-S6), all denied the allegation. LPA Richard attempted to interview R1, who declined to answer any questions asked. Records reviewed, dated 09/30/2024, showed that most of the residents had visitors at the facility. During the visit to the facility on 12/03/2024, the department observed several family members visiting the residents; some of them signed in, and some of them refused to sign in. Based on interviews, observations, and records reviewed, there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the Assistant Administrator Jesus Chavez.
|