1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | R1's two (2) discharge paperwork from hospital #1 (H1) and hospital #2 (H2), shift crossover notes (dated: 06/24/25 through 07/05/25) and LPA observed R1's injuries. Please see LIC813-C. LPA attempted to interview R3 once more, R3 was not available for interview due to current medical condition. LPA attempted to interview R4 & R5 and both were not available for LPA's interview. R4 due to medical condition and R5 having denied LPA's interview request.
Investigation revealed the following: Regarding the allegation, "Staff inappropriately restrained resident resulting in injury.", it is being alleged that a resident had redness on both forearms from being restrained by staff. On 07/10/25, from 1:30 - 4:30 LPA interviewed S1-S3, R1 & R2, and W1. R3 was not available for LPA's interview, due to R3 currently resting. R4 & R5 were not available for LPA's interview. R4 due to medical condition and R5 having denied LPA's interview. On 07/11/25, from 09:00am - 11:00am, LPA conducted record reviews. Record reviews revealed the following: R1 was discharged from hospital #1 (H1) and was later discharged from H2, which aligns with the date(s) in question. All three staff (S1,S2&S3), resident one and two (R1&R2) and W1 have disagreed the allegation has taken place at the facility. R1 stated, "Two (2) of the guys near the hospital, grabbed me and stomped all over me.", which indicate the allegation has not taken place at this facility. Based on record reviews, LPA observation(s) and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Regarding the allegation, "Staff handled residents in a rough manner.". It is being alleged that a resident was bruised by staff. On 07/10/25, from 1:30 - 4:30 LPA interviewed S1-S3, R1 & R2, and W1. R3 was not available for LPA's interview, due to R3 currently resting. R4 & R5 were not available for LPA's interview. R4 due to medical condition and R5 having denied LPA's interview. On 07/11/25, from 09:00am - 11:00am, LPA conducted record reviews. Record reviews revealed the following: R1 was discharged from hospital #1 (H1) and was later discharged from H2, which aligns with the date(s) in question. All three staff (S1,S2&S3), resident one and two (R1-R2) and W1 have disagreed the allegation has taken place at this care facility. R1 stated, "I guarantee to you that they didn’t do that here. That was at the hospital.", which indicates that the staff at this care facility are appropriately trained to care for the elderly. Based on record reviews, LPA observation(s) and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the above allegation has been Unsubstantiated.
Report continues, see LIC9099-C. |