1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On March 21, 2024, between 8:54 AM and 5:00 PM, the Department interviewed staff members identified as Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3 (S1-S3) who disputed this accusation. Three (3) out of the (3) staff members uttered we genuinely value and appreciate every resident, regardless of how they may respond to the staff. We understand that some might perceive rule enforcement or care procedures as punitive, but these measures are vital for ensuring their health and safety. We strive to maintain transparency by documenting all interactions, which promotes clarity and fairness. What might feel like retribution is our commitment to upholding rules that safeguard everyone. As (S1) stressed, we diligently follow each resident's care plan and deliver essential services. Any feelings of being disciplined often stem from misconceptions about our dedicated care and the consistent application of rules meant for everyone's benefit. S1-S3 expressed residents are permitted to smoke outside the facility without restrictions.
On March 21, 2024, between 8:54 AM and 5:00 PM, the Department interviewed resident members identified as Resident #1 to Resident #5 (R1-R5). Three (3) out of the five (5) asserted that they have never encountered any behavior of that nature from the staff and cannot support the claim. (R1-R2) reported that staff members limited communication between residents for safety and privacy reasons. However, they did not provide specific details or reasons for these restrictions. Four (4) out of five (5) claimed their facility did not have smoking restrictions and that smoking was allowed outside the facility. (R1) confirmed that the facility operated without restrictions, ensuring accessibility and flexibility.
The Department reviewed the records, including daily observations, staff documentation, and facility logs, from February 21, 2024, to March 20, 2024. This review found no evidence of behaviors intended to harm or punish individuals for their actions. Moreover, an analysis of the hands-on training conducted by staff included De-Escalation Techniques, Resident Rights, and Personal Care Procedures.
Based on the information gathered, there is not enough evidence to support the allegations mentioned above.
Based on the information collected from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegations. While the allegations may be valid or have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to establish whether the alleged violations took place or did not. Therefore, the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Mary Hauf, and copies of the reports were provided.
|