1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | had arrived. Police spoke with residents and staff. The police officers determined it was a civil matter and recommended staff to keep the residents separated. On 08/15/2025 at 8:45PM, R3 spoke with S4. R3 told S4 they wanted to call the police because they were afraid of R1. S4 told R3 that it's their right to call and make a report. During an interview with S4, stated R3 told them they were afraid R1 was going to hit them. Police officers came to the facility and spoke with residents involved in the incident. During interviews with Staff S1, stated Residents R1-R3 have been advised not to interact with one another, and that staff are present in common areas and during activities to ensure residents do not have a confrontation.
During interviews with Staff S1-S7, were asked how they ensure a resident does not harass another resident, seven (7) out of seven (7) stated they provide supervision to residents while in common area, and if residents have an issue with another resident staff speak with them to resolve the issue or to ensure it does not escalate.
During interviews with Residents R1-R7, were asked if they have been harassed by another resident, five (5) out of seven (7) stated no, they have not been harassed by a resident. Additionally, Residents R1-R7, were asked if staff prevent residents from harassing other residents, six (6) out of seven (7) stated yes, staff are there to prevent incidents and ensure there is no harassment.
During the course of the investigation, LPA was unable to find evidence to support the allegation(s). Although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
No deficiencies were observed or cited during today’s visit.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Assistant, Selena Cruz, and a copy of this report was provided.
|