1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed
On 6/6/25, LPA Felisa Shirley observed an email from R1’s doctor regarding administering medication changes forwarded to the facility’s Administrator instructing the caregivers to follow the directions of the doctor and to document and monitor for changes. LPA Shirley reviewed the email dated 5/31/25, from facility’s owner informing R1’s responsible party that R1 was may have been given the wrong medication. On 6/6/25, during the course of the investigation, LPA Shirley received a copy of the Special Incident Report dated 6/6/25 stating that there was a medication error that occurred May 19 thru 30, 2025.
LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). LPA asked, does staff ensure that medications are dispensed as prescribed. Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 stated yes. LPA interviewed Resident 1 – Resident 5 (R-1 – R-5). LPA asked residents, does staff give you your medications as prescribed. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 answered, yes.
Based on observations, information gathered and reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated.
Based on CCLD staff's observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6), is being cited, please see attached LIC-9099D.
Deficiencies were cited during today's visit.
An exit interview was conducted, and plans of corrections were developed with the Administrator, Marhlyn Sapugay . A copy of this report and appeals rights were provided. |