1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed as prescribed
On 6/6/25, LPA Shirley observed R1’s responsible party’s text dated, 5/13/25 sent to S1 regarding the reduction in medication indicated from R1’s doctor. During record review, LPA Felisa Shirley observed an email from R1’s doctor dated 5/13/25, regarding reducing divalproex to every other day for 2 weeks and to discontinue after. Per further review, LPA Shirley reviewed R1’s Medication Administration Record, (MAR), for May 2025 and the record shows that R1 received 500 mg of divalproex 2 times a day, daily from 5/1/25 through 5/31/25. During the course of the investigation, LPA Shirley received a copy of the Special Incident Report dated 6/6/25 stating that there was a medication error that occurred May 19 thru May 30, 2025.
LPA interviewed staff, staff 1 – staff 3 (S-1 – S-3). LPA asked, does staff ensure that medications are dispensed as prescribed. Of those interviewed 3 out of 3 stated yes. LPA interviewed Resident 1 – Resident 5 (R-1 – R-5). LPA asked residents, does staff give you your medications as prescribed. Of those interviewed, 5 out of 5 answered, yes.
Based on observations, information gathered and reviewed, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated.
Based on CCLD staff's observation and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title twenty-two (22), Division six (6), is being cited, please see attached LIC-9099D.
Deficiencies were cited during today's visit.
An exit interview was conducted, and plans of corrections were developed, with Anna Leeza DeGuzman, Caregiver. A copy of this report and appeals rights were provided.
|