| Regarding the Allegation: Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision.
This complaint alleged that the facility staff did not have staff working on 01/04/2026. LPA Calderon and S1 toured the facility. LPA Calderon noted resident coming and going. LPA Calderon noted 3 staff working and there were no negative interactions between staff and resident noted. Records review indicate the following: Reviewed incident report (dated 01/04/2026), report indicates that R1 complained of not feeling safe and called the police. Police arrived and did not find any issues. The Physician report (dated 06/10/2024) indicates that R1 has no cognitive health issues. LIC500 indicates that there is day, night and weekend staff working. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that there are 2 staff that work in the front house and 1 staff that work in the back house. S1 indicates that S1 family live on the property for any issues. 3 out of 3 staff deny the allegation. R1 indicates that on weekends there are no staff living or working in the back house. R1 indicates that R1 did not feel safe and called the police. R1 indicates that the police did not find any staff working. R2 could not be interviewed as R2 moved out of the facility. 2 out of 4 residents deny the allegation.
Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff do not provide adequate care and supervision” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Regarding the Allegation: Staff did not communicate effectively with the residents.
This complaint alleged that the facility staff did not speak English to residents in care. LPA Calderon toured the facility and noted staff speaking to residents in English. LPA Calderon did not notice any negative interactions between staff and residents. Records reviewed indicate the following: Reviewed incident report (dated 12/20/2025, 12/29/2025 and 01/04/2026), reports indicate that R1 had combative relations with staff. Interviews indicate the following: S1 indicates that R1 was combative with staff and advised S1 that R1 did not feel safe in the facility. S1 indicates that staff speak English and communicate with residents in care. S2-S3 interviewed with LPA Calderon in English. S2-S3 primary language is Spanish. 3 out of 3 staff deny the allegation. R1 indicates that the staff hired by the facility do not speak English and cannot communicate with residents in care. R2 cannot be interviewed due to R1 being moved to another facility. 2 out of 4 residents deny the allegation.
Based on interviews and supporting documentation, the preponderance of evidence standard has NOT been met therefore, the allegation of “staff do not communicate effectively with the residents” is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
|