Continued LIC9099-C page 3
Allegation 2: Staff failed to prevent a resident from eloping from the facility.
It was alleged that on October 24, 2024, R1 exited the facility without staff supervision. LPA interviewed Staff #1–5. 1 out of 5 staff members was not present during the incident but reported hearing that R1 never left the facility premises. 4 out of 5 staff members confirmed their presence during the incident and stated that while R1 exited the memory care unit, the resident did not leave the facility grounds and was under supervision at all times.
LPA interviewed residents #2-8 regarding the allegation, 7 out of 7 residents denied the allegation.
LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant and observed the facility's memory care unit is located on the second floor of the building. Based on LPA’s observation if a resident exits the memory care unit they would be in the hallway and would need to take an elevator down from the second floor to completely exit the facility premises.
Based on the investigation there is no evidence to support R1 eloped from the facility grounds.
Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated.
A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099, and LIC9099-C, was provided to the Memory Care Director Denyanna Banda.
An exit interview was conducted.
No deficiencies were cited.
|