1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | On 11/12/2024, between 9:59 AM and 11:51 AM, LPA interviewed Clients #1-4 (C1-C4). All four clients denied the allegations. However, two of the four clients confirmed the use of gait belts.
On 11/12/2024, all three staff demonstrated how gait belts are used on clients. The demonstration revealed that gait belts are buckled from behind the clients.
On 11/12/2024, at 10:50 AM, LPA reviewed the records for Clients #1-4. No doctor’s orders for the use of gait belts or postural supports were observed.
On 11/12/2024, at 11:00 AM, LPA reviewed the personnel records for Staff #1-3. No documentation of employee training was observed.
Substantiated: Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted and the records that were reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.
Exit interview conducted with Alvin Banzuela (Administrator) and copy of the report and appeal right were provided. |