1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During interviews with staff (S#1-S#11), (11) out of (11) stated that currently there is not an outbreak at the facility, and the protocol when it comes to following proper infection precautions is the following: Once a resident tested positive, we quarantine the resident then we put a PPE station outside their room then we informed their physician and family members then we do contact tracing and disinfection of surfaces. After the sixth day, they can leave their room if they are not showing symptoms. Also, (11) out of (11) staff stated that the facility is following proper infection precautions, has an emergency plan in case of an infectious outbreak, is trained in following proper infection precautions, and would follow the steps.
During interviews with residents (R#1-R#11), (10) out of (11) residents stated that the facility does a good job when it comes to following proper infection precautions, and they have seen staff wearing masks in the past or when needed.
During this investigation, LPA found did not find sufficient evident to support the above-mentioned allegation(s).
Based on the evidence gathered, interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above-mentioned allegation(s) are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8).
An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the Complaint Report was given to Ralph Balbin /Executive Director.
|