1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Allegation: Staff do not ensure food served is of good quality.
It was alleged that the food served to residents was of poor quality and did not meet nutritional needs, and that inadequate staffing and oversight contributed to inconsistent meal preparation and insufficient attention to dietary requirements.
On 04/07/2026 between the hours of 8:40am – 8:52am, the Department interviewed A1 regarding the allegation. A1 denied the allegation and stated menus are created monthly and reviewed for nutritional adequacy. A1 reported not receiving complaints regarding food quality.
On 04/07/2026 between the hours of 11:55am – 1:33 pm, the Department interviewed five (5) staff regarding the allegation. Five (5) out of five (5) staff denied the allegation. Staff reported they had not received complaints regarding food quality and stated meals are prepared according to posted menus.
On 04/07/2026 between the hours of 9:00am – 11:52am, the Department interviewed ten (10) residents regarding the allegation. One (1) of ten (10) residents confirmed the allegation. Nine (9) of ten (10) residents denied the allegation. One resident reported dissatisfaction with food quality; other residents reported meals were satisfactory.
On 05/13/2026 between the hours of 10:00am – 11:00am, the Department conducted a records review of the facility’s posted Spring 2026 menus for Weeks 1, 3, and 4. The Department observed that the menus were dated, organized, and reflected balanced meals including proteins, vegetables, starches, fruits, and desserts. Breakfast menus included hot cereals, eggs, pancakes, and juice options. Lunch and dinner menus included soups, salads, meats, vegetables, and desserts. The Department observed that the menus aligned with the facility’s Admission Agreement requirement to provide three nutritious meals daily and accommodate special diets. No documentation was found indicating that meals served failed to meet nutritional standards or that residents were served food inconsistent with posted menus or dietary requirements.
Based on information gathered through interviews and record reviews, there is not enough evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted with Catherine Dacara and a copy of this report was provided.
|