1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (W1) reported that Residents #2, #3, and #4 (R2-R4) had positive feedback about the staff and their experiences at Casa Del Sol II Residence. (W2) added that (R1) frequently refused medications, which often led to (R1) exhibiting derogatory behaviors.
On January 22, 2025, between 11:30 AM and 12:30 PM, the Department interviewed resident members identified as R2, R3, R4, and R5 regarding the allegations. (R2-R5) were unable to validate the accusations. They described their experiences with the staff as positive, respectful, and professional, stating that they had not witnessed any verbal or physical mistreatment that would infringe upon the residents' rights.
An interview with Resident #1 (R1) was not possible as calls went unanswered.
The Department reviewed several documents regarding Resident #1 (R1). These included the physician's report (dated February 1, 2024); the Appraisal/Need and Service Plan (dated January 10, 2025); Facility Progress Notes (dated from January 10 to January 15, 2025); the Nurse's Admission Record (dated January 10, 2025); Identification and Emergency Information (dated April 21, 2022); the Self-Administration of Medication Assessment Record (dated January 10, 2025); and the Medication Administration Record covering (dated December 15, 2024, to January 13, 2025).
The review verified that (R1) is diagnosed with a mental illness, has refused to take medication for (23) consecutive days, and exhibits deprecating behaviors. Based on the gathered information, there is insufficient evidence to support the stated allegations.
Based on the information collected from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegations. While the allegations may be valid or have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to establish whether the alleged violations took place or did not. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated.
An exit interview was conducted with Veda Zelaya, and copies of the reports were provided.
This report serves as an amendment to clarify the findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected in the report created 01/22/25.
|