1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
Allegation: “Staff are not assessing residents for a higher level of care”, it is alleged that the facility is retaining residents who need higher-level of care, as many residents show signs of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. All (4) staff interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they do not have residents with dementia or Alzheimer’s disease. Staff indicated that some of the residents may have mild cognitive impairment but can still perform their daily activities. Staff stated that they assess residents regularly for any changes in their condition. S1 stated that they know not to retain residents with dementia or Alzheimer’s disease as they require a higher level of care that the facility is licensed to provide. All (5) residents interviewed denied the allegation and stated that they are quite independent and can manage their daily tasks. Residents stated they experience memory lapses at times or have occasional forgetfulness (like misplacing items) but are aware that those are part of aging. During interviews, LPA observed that residents appeared alert and communicative. A review of (5) random physician’s reports revealed that none of the patients have been diagnosed with dementia or Alzheimer's disease. In addition, the incident reports revealed a low incident rate of falls, injuries, or changes in conditions, as well as no reports of re-occurring issues. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Allegation: “Staff are not checking on residents in a timely manner.” It is alleged that the facility often keeps residents with cognitive impairment alone in their rooms without proper supervision or care and that some residents rarely come out of their rooms. All (4) staff interviewed denied the allegation, stating they provide necessary care and supervision, have adequate staffing, including night and on-call staff and follow residents' care plans. Staff also stated they completed the necessary training, including shadowing. All (5) residents interviewed denied the allegation, praising the staff for their care and timely responses to calls using pendants or call lights. Residents stated they can handle their everyday tasks, need minimal assistance and are free to stay or leave their rooms whenever they want. During the visit, LPA pressed the resident’s call light in Room C4's bathroom to check response times, and it took staff 01:03.58 minutes to respond to the call. LPA observed the residents to be clean and interact well with staff and other residents. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation.
|