1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation revealed the following:
In regards to the allegation: “Resident was sexually abused while in care.”, it is alleged that a boy came in Resident #1 (R1)’s room, took off R1’s top and raped R1. It is also alleged that the boy touched R1 in the private area between the legs. This investigation was completed by Investigator Christine Ferris with the Investigations Branch. Interviewed staff denied the allegation and stated that the facility does not have male staff except for the Administrator. Staff stated that no one has reported anything to them about any type of abuse. All staff interviewed indicated that they have not seen any "boys" or male in any resident's room. Staff stated that male workers would do maintenance work in the facility from time to time, however the work is done when the clients are out in the day program. Administrator stated that there was always staff supervision when maintenance work is being done. R1 did not disclose any sexual abuse during the interview and denied any “boys” have been in the home or in R1’s room. R1 denied anyone she did not want in her room has entered her room. R1 also denied anyone touched her in her private areas while at home. R2-R3 denied any “boys” enter the home or the clients’ rooms, denied any knowledge of sexual abuse, and denied anyone disclosed any sexual abuse to them. All 3 residents stated they feel safe and well cared for in the facility. W1 stated that she has no concerns with the facility or with the client’s safety. Administrator stated that San Gabriel Pomona Regional Center (SGPRC) was aware of the allegation and conducted investigation but A1 has not received an update or report. LPA followed up with SGPRC but no response received. LPA reviewed the Personnel report/LIC500 and did not observe any male staff on the roster except for the Administrator.
Based on statements and interviews conducted with residents and staff as well as reviewed files and documentation, there was not enough supportive evidence to corroborate the allegation.
Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview and a copy of this report was provided to Lara Langa, DSP I & II /Co-Manager. |