1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The investigation reveals the following: Regarding "Facility staff do not treat resident with respect", it is alleged that R1 is being treated differently by S1. LPA interviewed administrator and confirmed that no resident complained about being disrespected by staff. 3/3 staff stated they have never disrespect the residents and have not witness other staff being disrespectful. 3/5 residents stated staff has never been disrespectful and it is usually the residents that disrespect the staff. 1/5 (R2) residents stated staff never disrespect them but has witness staff disrespecting another resident but is unsure of the name of the resident and staff. 1/5 (R1) residents stated that they felt like staff was treating them differently but since meeting with Case manger the staff has been nicer.
The investigation reveals the following: Regarding " Facility staff yell at resident", it is alleged that the S1 yells at R1. Administrator stated staff has never yelled at residents and no residents complained about staff. 3/3 staff stated they have not witnessed staff yelling at residents and have not heard residents complain about staff. 3/5 residents stated staff never yelled at them nor have they witness staff having those behaviors with other residents. 1/5 (R2) residents stated they have witness staff yelling at a resident but do not recall what was said, and who the resident or the staff were. 1/5 (R1) residents stated that staff yelled at them but now the staff has been nice.
The investigation reveals the following: Regarding " Facility staff did not safeguard resident's personal property", it is alleged that a caregiver put R1’s phone on silent to keep R1 from calling for assistance. Administrator stated there was one incident with a resident stating staff took their phone. The facility reviewed the camera for that day and confirmed no one entered the resident’s room. The administrator also stated staff assisted the resident in searching for the phone. The resident later found the phone in their personal property, but staff was not allowed to search the item the phone was found in during the initial search. 1/3 (S1) staff stated residents has complained about missing property and staff will assist them in searching for the missing item. Staff stated residents usually finding their missing property in their room. 2/3 staff stated they have not seen staff take residents belongings. 4/5 residents stated they have not had missing items since they moved in and do not hear other residents complain about missing items. 1/5 (R1) residents stated they were missing a phone and believe staff took and turned it on silent.
Based on LPA's interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegation may have happened or is valid,
there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the
allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Exit interview conducted with Luisa Mascardo and a copy of this record provided. |