1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | In regards to the allegation "Facility staff restricting resident's telephone access," it is alleged that the facility staff are not picking up calls from R1's family who have been attempting to contact R1. During interviews with the residents, one (1) out of six (6) residents interviewed indicated that they do not have access to speak with their family through the facility's phone. During an interview with R1 they stated that they have not been allowed to speak with their family members by phone, and they are not aware of the reason why they haven't been allowed to speak with their family. Another resident interviewed stated that sometimes there will be an individual using the phone so it is not immediately available, however it is typically always available. During interviews with the staff, two (2) out of three (3) corroborated that phone calls were restricted for R1's family. One staff interviewed stated that have been advised not to answer the phone whenever the family of R1 calls, and that R1's family calls from various phone numbers. Another staff interviewed was told that R1's POA has a preference that the facility staff do not accept calls from R1's other family members due to the potential for abuse, and therefore they have not been taking R1's family's calls, nor have they been notifying R1 that they are received calls from R1's family.
Based on LPA interviews conducted with the clients and staff, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met for the above allegations, therefore the allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC9099Ds.
Exit interview held and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided to the administrator Iwona Kaya. |