1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | ***This report serves as an amendment and supersedes the original complaint investigation report created on 05/24/2022. ***
In regard to allegation: “Facility did not follow resident's care plan," it was alleged that staff did not follow resident's care plan to take care of resident#3. Two (2) residents were interviewed. Two (2) out of two (2) residents could not corroborate the allegation which revealed that staff followed their care plan to provide care. LPA interviewed with staff from Staff#1 to Staff #3. They denied the allegation. Interviews revealed that staff followed residents' care plan. Review of residents' records revealed staff followed residents care plan to provide care.
In regard to allegation: "Resident developed gangrene while in care," it was alleged that resident#3 developed gangrene while residing at the facility. Two (2) out of two (2) residents could not corroborate the allegation. Interview with resident#3 family member stated there was a wound on resident's right toe and no medical document to confirm the wound was a gangrene. Interviews staff from Staff#1 to Staff #3, staff denied the allegation. Review of residents' records revealed no medical record stated resident#3 developed gangrene when residing at the facility. Interviews and record reviews did not reveal resident#3 developed gangrene while in care.
In regard to allegation: "Resident did not receive medication as prescribed by a physician," it is alleged that staff did not administer medication to resident#3 as physician prescribed. Two (2) out of two (2) residents could not corroborate the allegation. Interviews staff from Staff#1 to Staff #3, staff denied the allegation. Review of residents' records revealed staff administered medication as prescribed. Staff interview revealed that residents have right to accept or reject medication. Interviews and record reviews did not reveal staff failed to administer medication as physician prescribed to residents.
Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove
the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited according to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8.
An exit interview was conducted with staff, Elizah; a hard copy of the report was provided on 5/24/22. This amended Licensing report is emailed to Licensee / Administrator, Steven Dong for signature on 6/15/22. |