1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of 2
On 10/23/23 LPA conducted a visit and interviewed few staff. Some staff were not present on that day. Therefore, LPA interviewed them on other dates. A total of 11 staff were interviewed. (Staff # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11).
Ten randomly parents were also contacted of whom two parents responded with positive feedback.
Seven children were attempted to be interviewed but not successful. Children were not qualified due to their young age.
During interviewing 11 staff, LPA found out that only 5 staff were present during the occurrence of this incident on the playground. (Staff # 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 with 20 children). Each group had their own staff. Staff # 1 and staff # 2 were responsible for the group of 10 children when the incident happened).
Staff denied staff yelling at children. Staff did not confirm yelling at children during this incident or any other occasions. Staff # 1 stated she yelled to stop the children of occurring the incident by did not yell at children. Staff # 1 stated she took child # 1 and child # 2 inside the classroom and talked to children about the incident inside the classroom. There were no other witnesses around staff # 1 when talking to child # 2. Staff # 1 stated she calmed down child # 1 because of crying. Staff # 2 did not confirm yelling at children. The other two staff who were present on the playground during the incident did not hear staff yelling at children. Staff # 5 stated she observed staff # 1 yelling to stop the children of the incident. LPA interviewed 6 other staff. They did not acknowledge staff yelling at children.
Based on the interviews conducted with a total of 11 staff, 10 parents of whom 2 responded with positive feedback, and attempted interviews with 7 children, there is not enough proof or evidence to support the occurrence of the allegation. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging " Staff did not ensure child was spoken to in an appropriate manner."; although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove, the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Notice of Site Visit was posted. The notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. The director, Amy Rivas was provided a copy of their appeal right (LIC 9058 1/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.
Exit interview was conducted with director, Amy Rivas.
End of report |