1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | During the investigation on 05/17/2023, LPA Chan conducted interviews with staff, observation of children in care, and reviewed incident reports. On several occasions during this investigation, LPA attempted to call parents of the child (C1) who allegedly was injured. There were other children reported to have allegedly received injuries while in care. LPA attempted to call parents of children who were included in the allegation, however there was no response from any.
On 05/17/2023, 05/19/23 and 05/22/23, LPA again attempted to contact and interview 3 parents. Only 1 responded and no concerns related to the allegation with regards to staff not adequately supervising children.
On 05/17/23, 4 of 4 facility staff were interviewed regarding allegation. Staff interviewed stated they were not aware of any unexplained injuries sustained by any day care children. For any injury that occurs, a notification is sent out to parents through Procare app or by text message in a timely manner. There is a cellphone policy in place that staff are aware of and trained on. The policy is Cellphones are only used for Procare and should not be used for any other purpose or personal use. Staff interviewed denied using the cellphone for personal use when supervising children. There may have been occasion(s) when a staff was seen using a cellphone, however there is no way to determine if this was for Procare or personal.
On 5/18/2023 preschool children on the playground were assessed and interviewed 4 children. None of the children were showing outward injuries. When the children were asked about getting injuries in school, children stated they get band-aids from the teacher. None of the children expressed getting seriously hurt while in care or needing more than a band-aid.
Due to inconsistent statements obtained, and information did not corroborate allegations, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
Page 2 of 3
|