1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of 2
the gate so staff # 2 could get to the child at the gate. Staff # 2 stated staff did not see staff # 1 to get physical with child # 1. Staff # 2 observed child # 1 stumbled back at the gate but did not fall. LPA interviewed staff # 3 whom staff said was getting close to the gate on the black top of the elementary school. Staff # 3 who was 20 feet away from the gate witnessed staff # 1 pushed the child back with hands open and child # 1 stumbled back but did not fall. LPA attempted to interview child # 1 but was not successful. There are no other witnesses to this incident.
Based on the interviews with 3 staff, and attempted interview with child # 1, LPA found out there were discrepancies in 3 staffs' statements. Therefore there is not enough evidence to prove the incident of staff # 1 has pushed the child back or not.
In the areas that were evaluated, no deficiency was cited of the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 12 Section.
A notice of site visit was given to facility representative, Heidi Argent. and must remain posted on, or immediately adjacent to, the interior side of the main door for 30 days.
Exit interview conducted and report was reviewed with the facility representative, Heidi Argent.
End of report
|