| Page 2
LPA conducted a visit on 01/29/2024 and interviewed five (5) staff including S1. During the interview with staff, 4 out of 5 staff were able to describe the personal rights of a child. 3 out of 5 staff informed LPA that they were not within line of site during the incident or did not personally witness the incident.
During the interview with S1, they denied forcefully grabbing C1. S1 mentioned that A1 was not usually the person that drops off C1 at school. S1 stated A1 asked them for assistance in prying C1’s arms off A1’s legs. S1 stated they took C1 by the wrist and guided them from behind A1.
On 01/29/2024, LPA interviewed four (4) children, but two (2) children were not qualified. The children did not disclose any pertinent information regarding the allegation of this complaint.
LPA interviewed four (4) parents, but two (2) parents were unavailable. Parents did not disclose any pertinent information regarding the allegation of this complaint.
On 03/26/2024, LPA interviewed A1. A1 stated they did not feel C1 was handled in a rough manner by S1. A1 stated C1 was refusing to get in line with the children. A1 stated there was another staff member who assisted S1 in lifting C1 by each arm, but they do not know their name.
Based on LPA’s interviews, the allegation staff handled daycare children in a rough manner may have happened or valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated.
Exit interview was conducted with Principal/On Site Administrator Guadalupe Manzanilla. The Notice of Site Visit was posted. Facility representative was informed that the Notice of Site Visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalty of $100. The Facility Representative was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.
End of Report
|