1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Regarding allegation: Facility does not have adequate staffing:
During the staff interviews, 6 out of 6 staff stated if they need support/help in classroom with children, they will call front office and front office will send assistance. S1 stated “we help each other from infant to toddler classroom”. S2 stated “I will call administrators for help, and they will send staff to help”. S3 stated S3 will call the office if S3 is out of ratio. S4 stated “if I am going to be out of ratio, I’ll immediately call the office to inform them, and the office will send someone to help”. S6 stated “we help staff. They will call the office or use walkie talkie, or (kitchen staff) and we will go out to help them”. During the inspection on 5/1/25, LPA observed extra staff available to support staff in classrooms and the facility was in compliance with the ratio requirement. During the investigation, LPA obtained and reviewed Children Sign in & out Sheets along with the Face to Name sheets for 4/24/25 and 5/20/24. The facility was found in compliance with the ratio requirement.
Regarding allegation: Facility did not report incidents to authorized representative:
During the staff interviews, 6 out of 6 staff stated they complete Incident Reports and send messages to parents through Sprout About or inform director and director will call parents. S2 stated “we will sooth child, address injury, notify (director) about the injury and then fill out injury report. It’s a carbon copy and parent takes yellow copy, and white copy stays in center. Administrators will call and notify parent. S3 stated “notify the office and the office notifies the parents. We have to complete an Incident Report.” S4 stated “we tell the office what happened, then we complete incident report, and write what we did to sooth child; where was injury, and who was affected. There is a section to be completed by office after they called parent.”
LPA conducted interviews with 5 parent and 5 out of 5 parents stated they are satisfied with facility. LPA did not interview children due to children were being young and non-verbal.
Based on LPAs observations, interviews which were conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance evidence of staff did not prevent infant from harming other infants in care, staff did not return infant’s items to correct authorized representative, staff did not implement proper sanitation procedures in the facility, facility does not have adequate staffing, and facility did not report incidents to authorized representative has not been met. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated.
Page 4 of 5
|