1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of 2
During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed 8 staff, contacted 10 random parents. Children were not interviewed due to the nature of the complaint. The staff who were interviewed regarding the above allegation stated the following:
S1 stated they do not have a separate room. However, sick children are kept in the office under management’s supervision until picked up. Children who become sick during their presence, they will be sent home. They cannot come back the next day and should be free of fever for 24 hours.
S2 stated they isolate the children.
S3 stated sick children stay in the classroom or outside with other children until they are picked up.
S4 stated for example today a child threw up on the playground. Management was notified. Child was kept with the other children and not isolated until parent picked up the child.
S5 stated sick children stay in the office. Management calls parents for pick up.
S6 stated the sick children stay in the room. Sometimes they might isolate but not all the time.
S7 stated in S7’s experience, S7 observed C2 was not feeling well during the beginning of January. However, C2 was sitting at the same table after lunch in the classroom. C2 was not sent home. Sometimes sick children are brought to the office. S7 observed C1 was not feeling well on 1/16/2025. C1 threw up. However, C1 was with the rest of the children until picked up.
S8 stated S8 observed C1 on the playground throwing up on 1/16/2025. C1 was still among children and not isolated until picked up.
LPA learned that the staff are aware of children’s sick policy of their school. However, there is discrepancies in staffs’ statements regarding isolation of sick children. However, S3, S4, S6, S7, and S8 confirmed that they have observed that sick children are not isolated from other children on one occasion or more.
Based on the interviews with 8 staff, 10 random parents of whom 3 responded, two parents expressed no concerns regarding the above allegation. However, one parent was concerned regarding their child get sick more often, it was determined the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, the allegation of " 1) staff do not ensure children are isolated from other children when showing symptoms of illness
found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Therefore, California Code of Regulations, Title 22 is cited on next page. Section 101226.2(a) Isolation for Illness. Notice of Site Visit was posted. The notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. In the areas which were investigated, the following deficiency is cited today. The director, Barbara Brown was provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC 9058 1/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights.
Exit interview was conducted with director, Barbara Brown. |