1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | Page 2 of 2
During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed Licensee and 3 other adults that they work with children at this facility. Licensee stated she takes two weeks off during the year one week in summer time and one week in another time. She said she might be out for emergency or doctor's appointments but her day care is open with adult # 2, 3, and 4. Licensee stated her day care was closed for Spring Break from Monday 4/1/2024 to 4/5/2024 with advanced notice to parents. The day care resumed on Monday and Tuesday without the presence of Licensee and adult # 2. However adult # 3 and adult # 4 were present with less than 10 children. Licensee was at the facility on Wednesday and Thursday with adult # 2 in split shift with adult # 3 and 4. The licensee stated on Friday April 12th she was not present at the facility but adult # 2 was with adult # 3 in the morning and with adult # 4 in the afternoon. LPA interviewed adult # 2, 3, and 4. They stated licensee is present most of the time. On the days the licensee is out, adult # 2 is present with adult # 3 in the morning and adult # 4 in the afternoon. Adult # 3 and 4 stated that on Friday April 12 they were at the facility with less than 10 children with adult # 2 in split shifts. Adult # 2, 3, and 4 stated they have not been alone with children.
LPA attempted to interview 5 children who were qualified but they could not tell LPA exactly how many staff and how many adults were with them on different days and times due to their age being young. However children could name the adults working at the facility. LPA contacted 9 parents. Out of nine parents, 3 parents responded with positive feedback. Based on the interviews conducted with the Licensee, adult # 2, 3, and 4, contact of 9 parents of whom 3 responded, interview five children, and observations of the number of children and adults present on 4/16/2024 and today, there is not enough proof or evidence to support the above allegations occurred or did not occur. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Licensee did not maintain required staffing ratios and "Licensee is not present the required amount of time while the day care is operating"; although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove, the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Notice of Site Visit was posted. The notice of site visit must be posted for 30 consecutive days. Failure to post will result in civil penalties of $100. The licensee, Gisele Vaziri was provided a copy of their appeal right (LIC 9058 1/16) and their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these rights. No deficiency cited on this inspection date. Exit interview was conducted with licensee, Gisele Vaziri.
End of report |