1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | The Reporting Party (RP) stated that on Tuesday 01/20/2026, RP observed the child #6 (C6)’s ear to be very bruised along with a bump, and that C6’s wrist was red as well. RP further reported that C6 disclosed that Staff #1 (S1) grabbed C6’s hand in a rough manner trying to pull C6 back and caused C6 to hit C6’s ear on the door.
During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, reviewed the video footage, and obtained pertinent documents. LPA also conducted interviews with the Reporting Party, 5 Staff Members, 5 Parents, and 5 Children.
Regarding the allegation of “Staff handled a day-care child in a rough manner resulting in injury.”
During the physical plant inspection today,1/28/2026, LPA reviewed the video footage. However, the footage was too blurry to clearly observe the interaction between S1 and C6.
During the staff interview, 5 out of 5 staff denied the allegation of Staff handled a day-care child in a rough manner resulting in injury. All staff stated that they never touch or grab the children in care when they are not following directions and rules. When children are misbehaving, staff will redirect them to do a different activity that the children like. S1 stated that S1 never pulls, grabs, or pushes C6 under any circumstance.
During the parent interview, all 5 interviewed parents did not divulge any information pertaining to the allegation or express any concerns regarding the care of the children.
During the children interview, all 5 children did not disclose any information pertaining to the allegation.
Based on LPA’s observations, interviews, and records review, the preponderance evidence of Staff handled a day-care child in a rough manner resulting in injury has not been met. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated.
Page 2 of 3
|