1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25 | Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) P Rivas conducted an unannounced case management visit to investigate incident reports dated 03/30/22 and 04/11/22 provided by Director, Cortez. The Covid-19 Emergency Response questionnaires were asked. Census; 54 children and 8 staff members. A review of facility Personnel Report Summary on this date indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks have received criminal record and child abuse index clearances or exemptions.
LPA had commenced investigation of incidents on 04/19/22.
In reference to the incident of 03/30/22; On previous report LPA referenced incident as incident of 04/01/22 however, it was the incident reported for 03/30/22. Alleged incident involved Child 6(C6) and C7, alleged that C7 drew a graphic inappropriate picture and gave it to C6. During today's visit LPA continued to interview children and staff. Parents were also interviewed from 12:45 to 2:00pm. Interviews with 9 out of 10 children did not divulge any inappropriate or graphic drawings being drawn or shown or seen by children. 1 out of the 10 indicated to having received an inappropriate drawing. Per interview with three staff, they did not observe any inappropriate pictures being drawn or observed. Per 3 teachers interviewed, after drawings are completed children place items in their cubby space(storage); teachers at the end of the day give items from a child's cubby to parents at the end of day and all 3 reported that no inappropriate or graphic pictures were viewed in cubbys. One of three teachers indicated that the two children involved in this incident had given teacher their pictures to post on the wall. LPA viewed pictures posted to be of C6 of a girl with a mask; picture from C7 was picture of a house, with a person; Interview with parents indicated they had not observed, inappropriate, graphic, drawing . Based on interviews, review of records, physical plant tour, LPA did not observe any violation of Title 22 Regulations.
Cont. Page 2 |