1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32 | (RP) stated Child 1 (C1) consistently acts out in an aggressive manner towards the other children in care. The facility owner and director are not doing enough to protect the children. Two examples given were on one occasion C1 intentionally poked Child 3 (C3) in the eye with a paintbrush and C1 ran up to Child 4 (C4) and shook C4 and made C4 cry. When staff intervene, C1 bites, kicks, and punches staff.
During the course of the investigation, LPA interviewed 6 staff members and contacted 10 parents/authorized representatives but only 4 responded. 7 children qualified using the Ten Step Investigative Interview Questionnaire. 1 out of 7 children declined the interview. 1 out 7 did not complete the entire interview.
During the staff interviews, 6 out of 6 staff stated the staff can prevent children from engaging in inappropriate behaviors with other children. 4 out of 6 staff stated C1 needed more attention than the other children enrolled. In addition, 2 out of 6 staff stated additional training may have been helpful with C1. 1 out of 6 staff requested a shadow as that would have been helpful in attending to the needs of C1. 2 out of 6 staff stated there were not enough tools to support the needs of C1. 3 out of 6 staff stated C1 has been known to hit teachers, hit other children, kick things, throw things (C1 picked up a bottle and threw it at the glass window), C1 wants everything on the floor, physical and verbal tantrums with bad words. C1 began exhibiting these behaviors around October 2025. The guidance from the director was to be patient with C1, redirect C1 when there was inappropriate behavior, and/or contact the director or Staff 6 (S6) to help. Staff did not receive formal training to address children with behaviors. When S1 or S6 were contacted to help, the options were typically to take C1 out of the classroom, walk outside, go on the computer in the office, or call parents/authorized representatives to pick up C1, which did not work. This guidance/protocol was reportedly followed by all staff. 1 out of 6 staff stated the removal of C1 to go outside, go on the computer in the office, or call to be picked up by parents/authorized representatives turned into a reward system for C1. Facility met with parents/authorized representatives on 11/17/2025, 12/08/2025, and 12/11/2025. During the final meeting, Staff 3 (S3) reported the parent/authorized representative stated a change of environment may be good for C1. S3 reportedly agreed. The director stated the facility may meet the needs of C1 with patience and listening to C1. The director stated C1 is no longer enrolled at the day care.
6 children qualified using the Ten Step Investigative Interview Questionnaire. 5 out of 6 children witnessed |